
Return to
Billy's contents page
|
Billy King: Rites Again
All
right, after that exclusive interview with Mars, back to normal. Billy here
himself with a few more thoughts before you cook the dinner/books/your goose or
fall asleep/down the stairs/into the autumn. Rape and Pilger
D’ye
see John Pilger’s programme ‘Breaking the silence’ on UTV/British ITV on
22nd September? It looked at the aftermath of wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and
what had changed or not changed, also contrasting US and UK statements with
reality. Afghanistan
is a total mess. The government’s writ only runs in Kabul and it has no
reconstruction budget worth talking about.
The warlords control most of the country and fear and rape are used
regularly. A destitute woman went to the USA embassy pleading for help because
her husband and children had been wiped out by a US bomb (she had
documentation); she was called a beggar and turned away. In
Iraq the contrast was more about what was promised and what is current reality.
It showed Condoleeza Rice and Colin Powell at separate times in 2001 saying
Saddam Hussein was no threat, he couldn’t get weapons because of embargoes.
A US Department of Defense (sick) spokesperson either didn’t know his
facts or was lying through his teeth; initially saying the US didn’t kill
civilians, he challenged Pilger’s figure of up to 10,000 civilians killed in
the Iraq war, and also denied that the US had sold ingredients for weapons of
mass destruction to Iraq (which Pilger proved with an extract from the
Congressional record). After a while the spokeperson’s military minder stepped
in and halted the interview – which is something you might have expected in
Soviet Russia or Stalinist era China. Another
US Administration spokesman was interviewed, and while the camera was still
rolling at the end of the interview, accused Pilger of being a (British) Labour
supporter (hey, wasn’t T. Blair, leader of said party, G Bush’s only ally in
the war?) or a ‘communist’. What a pathetic attempt to slur incisive
questioning. What
I did find alarming, that it should even be asked (in the sense that it needed
to be asked) was the question of whether the USA was in a pre-fascist phase.
For a minute I wondered had I heard right.
But no, it was the real ‘f’ word (the other is so common these days
as to be unremarkable). With
the xenophobia and rightist extremism existing in the USA today it might seem a
good question but personally I would feel it is a bit sloppy use of the term
‘fascism’ which deserves to be kept for dictatorial regimes.
But that doesn’t mean that ‘democratic’ regimes (and the Bush
presidency is not even actually democratic if you remember what happened at the
last US presidential election) cannot act in a brutal, selfish, hateful,
spiteful, self-centred and neo-imperialist way.
The USA has exercised all kinds of extremism at different times – not
just the Vietnam War which killed millions in SE Asia, not just the McCarthy era
in the 1950s, not just the period around the end of the First World War when
anti-communism first took a radical right turn, not just US imperialism in the
Philippines and elsewhere around the turn of the Twentieth century, not just the
‘manifest destiny’ of the mid-nineteenth century which promulgated the
USA’s ‘right’ to dominate the Americas, not just the internal imperialism
of native born whites and settlers who pushed the native peoples of North
America close to extinction. No, US
‘democracy’ has had plenty of extremism without becoming ‘fascist’ or
even ‘pre-fascist’. But isn’t it fascinating that a serious
British-produced programme should ask that question. And indicative of what a
deep hole the USA is in today. Blowing in the wind
Our
web meister informs us that if you do a search with Google putting in
‘innate’, guess what site comes head of the list, why ‘INNATE’, your
favourite (and only!) Irish Network for Nonviolent Action Training and
Education. Meanwhile page downloads on the INNATE website now average over 3,000
a month – admittedly many of those are people who stumble there inadvertently,
such as the person I referred to before in this Colm who wanted to learn ‘to
spake sexy Spanish on line’, and they presumably don’t get beyond the home
page. But good to see that in September, someone who input ‘the complete
consensus’ as their search downloaded 19 pages, and someone who tried
‘nonviolence quiz’ and came to the site downloaded 48 pages!
Glad to be of service. Unfortunately
there were others who would have found the INNATE website unfulfilling.
Those who were looking for “an post cork sorting office phone
number”, “voice trainers in co wicklow”, “2003 email address of jim in
london”, or “minibus driving lessons in co. limerick” (we get about you
know) would not have got what they wanted. Nor indeed would the person, of the male gender one would
presume, who put in “irish sexy ass girls”, though at least you might be
able to guess what he was looking for. But what would you make of the people who
inputted “the reason the queen is disloyal to the king” or “partition
piano nothing compares to you”? Answers on a post card please (or an e-mail if
you like). Meanwhile
the British Library have requested permission to archive the INNATE website as
part of their attempt to preserve some of what’s on the net – it can be an
ethereal and very time limited media. Blowing
our own trumpet would be a bit overdoing it, I think, but just maybe we could
blow our own tin whistle for a little while. Fancy a tune? But there’s still
lots more we want to get on the website….and the lack of time is the main
obstacle [so offers of help always welcome – Ed]. Spies, lies and mud pies
Very
interesting. Arms producer BAE Systems (then called British Aerospace), paid
exorbitant amounts to have the British campaigning group Campaign Against Arms
Trade (CAAT) spied on by at least half a dozen agents in the 1990s – which
emergent fact mystified CAAT as they were and are, as they claim, always pretty
open. This was when CAAT was actively opposing the sale of BAE’s Hawk jets to
Indonesia, that bastion of human wrongs. But
nobody should be surprised. Some of you may remember the McLibel trial in London
where McDonalds took a (from their point of view, it proved) foolhardy and
long-running libel action against two London Greenpeace activists (not to be
confused with Greenpeace International) [tho’ you’re doing a good job of
confusing us – Ed]. In this it
transpired [or do you mean conspired? – Ed] that in some small group meetings
the infiltrators could be in a majority!!!!
So spying by multinational and large scale enterprises up to no good is
not unexpected. And so far as the
‘official’ state spying agencies In Northern Ireland are concerned, I would
hate to think what they did not spy on…. What
is also very interesting is the extent to which special branch and the like have
spied on peaceniks in the Republic, a ‘neutral’ state
One instance. 1981 and the flowering of the then new wave of anti-nuclear
movement in Europe. Irish CND
(Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) was closely monitored by the special
branch of the Garda Siochana. I
know cos I wuz there. At 11.30
p.m., the then pub closing time, our lift was passing the GPO in central Dublin
on the way home to the north side when, as fast as you could say “it’s a
hold up”, one squad car pulled in front, another behind, as if we were
dangerous and violent criminals who would take off at 90 miles per hour down
O’Connell Street if given the chance. Maybe the police had been watching too
many detective movies. Then we were questioned. We were returning from a
‘Dawn’ magazine (in some ways a precursor of INNATE) fundraiser in Rathmines
What had happened was the driver, who actually made his living as a taxi
driver though this was ‘in his own time’, had been at a CND demo earlier in
the day, in the afternoon the only
possible explanation is the special branch followed him to Rathmines and the
Dawn fundraiser, and stayed there watching the car all night until
melodramatically swooping in O’Connell Street at the busiest time of the
night, when the pubs were closing and people were running for the last bus.
What a total waste of police resources.
And what a criminal indictment of a state which purported to be
‘neutral’. Natural cycles
‘A
crank is a small object that causes revolutions’ may be a political slogan or
pun, but it brings to mind the world of sigh cling. It’s good to see that the numbers of commuting cyclists in
Belfast has been increasing (the bike shop owner agreed with my assessment) –
some mornings ago at 9.15 a.m. I saw almost 15 cyclists within the space of
under one kilometre, admittedly between a busy road in south Belfast, a bike
lane I travel on for a couple of hundred metres, and a park. Cycling in Belfast,
as in many other places in Ireland, has been a lonely experience so it’s good
to see it on the up. Cycling in Dublin, on the other hand, is a totally
different (though not safer) experience – upwards of thirty years ago, if I
remember correctly, a US woman setting up a free magazine for Dublin called it
‘Pushbike’ because of the connotations Dublin had for her of cycling, and
that was before the number of people cycling in Dublin increased again. Personally
I believe the revolution will only come riding on a pushbike (when it’s not
dancing that is). There are so many reasons. Our Headitor is also a velocipede
user; he tells me some time ago he had a letter in a religious magazine in reply
to a piece about a US seminar on ‘What car Jesus would drive?’ (!); his
letter stated it would be a bike because he’d like to keep in shape, he could
stop and talk to people as he travelled, and he wouldn’t be contributing to
the destruction of Creation. He
ended the letter with the injunction to ‘Put more phew in the pew!’.
Unfortunately on a global level it is the car which is still cruising ahead.
But like the hare and the tortoise I believe a second cycling revolution
is coming. So put your best foot
forward on that pedal. Which reminds me of an appalling English language pun
with a hint of French thrown in - I haven’t told it for a while so here goes.
A snail went into an upmarket car showroom to look at the latest
expensive cars. The snail was keen on one particular – and very expensive
model. He asked whether they had
the ‘S’ model in that brand and make of car.
No, the salesperson told the snail, the ‘S’ model would be an extra
£30,000 and they didn’t feel the extras it gave were worth it.
The snail insisted – the ‘S’ model or nothing.
The salesperson wasn’t reluctant given it would mean more commission,
so told the snail that it could certainly be ordered.
The snail promptly ordered the car.
Six weeks later the car was delivered to the showroom and the snail came
to pick it up. The same salesperson
who sold them the car asked why they had insisted on the ‘S’ model when it
was so much more expensive. “Because”,
said the snail, “when people see me going by I want them to say, ‘Look at
that ‘S’ car go!’” Which
reminds me finally of another, sort of cycling, joke. There was the black
tarmac, the red tarmac (for buses), and the green tarmac (for bikes).
The black tarmac and the red tarmac met in the pub, and the black tarmac
forced the red tarmac to buy them a drink; the black tarmac was known to be a
bit of a hard character so the red tarmac immediately agreed to do the buying.
In came the green tarmac who came over to the black tarmac and said –
‘Get me a drink!’. The black tarmac jumped up immediately, rather
frightened, and ran over to get the drink. Later the red tarmac had the chance
to ask the black tarmac why they were so frightened of the green tarmac –
“Because they’re a cycle path” came the reply.
Keeping up appearances
Readers
of this Colm will know inherently the importance of keeping up appearances.
Nothing can be more important. And it is certainly not all about material
possessions; once you have your fancy house with all mod cons and
big driveway, a state of the art expensive car, the latest palm top
to go with a new PC, your massive TV with all the latest audio, video and
surround sound, and the trendiest mobile phone, well, what else is important? So
keeping up appearances is more than just material, indeed it can be a spiritual
quality. In my very first Cyber Colm (NN 83) I gave a short guide to ‘How to
be Greatly Humble’. The Dalai
Lama had just been to my locality so I advised that a) you tell people that
you’ve been invited to a private reception to meet him (or whatever Great
Spiritual Leader happens to be in town), but
b) sadly, you say, you already have a commitment to do something else with group
‘X’ and you couldn’t possible let them down.
That way people know you’re in with the Great and Good but too Humble
to break an existing commitment. Anyway,
I got to thinking of the importance of language and how you say what you’ve
been doing. So here is a handy Cut
Out And Keep Guide [mind the glass on your monitor – Ed]. The first part of the equation is what the actual situation
is; the second is what you say you’re doing.
Here goes. [Looks suspiciously like another of your Liszts – Ed]
Get
the idea? The possibilities are endless. You need never look back. [No, because
people will think you’re a complete pain in the arse, and that’s not even
speaking personally – Ed] [Dear,
dear, such language – Billy] [Dear, dear, no need to call me ‘dear’ - Ed]
[Would you rather I called you ‘cheap’? – Billy]
[Let’s terminate this conversation – Ed]. Well, that’s it for another month as we head towards
Hallowe’en and real winter. I
hope your fireside is warm, your harvest is all gathered, (both of these
literally as well as metaphorically), the roof is sound and there’s food in
the cupboard [sounds like a disaster warning – Ed]
[it’s southern horticulturalists who talk about dis aster – Billy].
Or maybe I should bid you farewell by saying ‘Buy for now’, Billy. |