|
[Return
to main page]
[A short version of Bill Moyer's 'Movement Action
Plan']
No problem perceived even through there is one; 10% public support; feeling
that "we'll never win"; people's moral values violated by powerholders
but not a public issue, indeed public believes the 'official' line. Opposition
comes from professional lobbyists and principled dissenters.
Public support rising slowly, now 20%; question is asked "What's
wrong with these protesters?"; opposition movement uses mainstream
channels and proves they don't work, show powerholders violating values;
opposition become experts, build their organisation.
Public now realising 'something is up'; 30% support. Public getting higher
expectations. There is isolated local, grass roots opposition which brings
in new people; the opposition use available networks of churches, unions
etc. Some prototype demonstrations are held.
People now realising there's a problem, issue getting 40 - 50% support.
There is loads of excitement, high hopes. It has become a big public issue
and it feels like a crisis (with associated panic, excitement and energy).
A trigger event may set this stage off (e.g. European decision on Cruise
missile deployment set off 1980s wave of anti-nuclear action). Informal,
non-hierarchical organisation grows.
Discouragement that success hasn't arrived. 50% agreeing, 50% 'maybes'
and 'no's'. Numbers at demonstrations fall; government pays no attention;
no real victories yet; strains of informal administration/organisation.
Dangers of drop out/burn out, more militant and/or violent action, and
internal movement divisions.
The movement may feel despondent but the public are moving; 60 - 80% support.
Hard work needed at grassroots and national levels to move from protest
to win mass public support; needing public education, nonviolent actions,
involving citizens, using official channels, grassroots organising, national
publicity etc.
Now 60 - 85% public support and a crisis atmosphere with massive public
discontent; the movement has become the 'good guys' and many powerholders
are won over. The public is less fearful of alternatives and are involved
in a big way through demonstrations or boycotts etc. Powerholders realise
they need to change policy or lose office. Ending can come through dramatic
or quiet showdown or attrition.
Public sees issue as won, many people move one to other issues. But may
need to pick up aspects of the issue which haven't been satisfactorily
dealt with (and which are at earlier stages) or spin offs (in Ireland
many from the anti-nuclear power movement of the end of the 'seventies
moved on to the nuclear disarmament movement).
[ for personal reflection or discussion]
- Think of some campaigns on different issues; which stage
would they be at?
- Do you think this 'road to success' applies or exists
in our context? If not, what stages would you see existing, or how should
the above model be modified to fit?
- What stage do you like best?
- In what stages would nonviolent direct action be most
appropriate?
- Where can your personal qualities and skills fit in?
Facilitator's Notes:
Time needed: Preferably 2 - 21/2 hours, you could do a certain amount
in 1 - 11/4 hours.
Give people the handout of stages as they arrive (as in
1-8 above)
1. Personal introductions, if needed,
and introduction to agenda.
Point out that this is not 'programmatic' in that movements may go backwards,
be in a couple of places at one time, or not fit the model adequately.
In this case, a new model that fits better could be developed by people.
2. Work through the stages, taking brief
comments and questions.
3. One-to-one (getting people to pair
off with someone they know less well or not at all) speaking-listening
exercise; one person speaks for 3-4 minutes, then reverse (listener can
ask 'drawing-out' questions).
Question
a) Where are you/have you been in campaigns and issues you
have been involved in?
b) Where can you realistically plan to be in 2 - 5 years time?
4. Spectrum:
Standing up, get people to divide in a line from stages 1 - 8:
a) Where do people see themselves in a particular campaign?
Ask why people have placed themselves in a particular location
b) Where do people most enjoy being? Again ask why.
5. Caucus (small group focused on one
issue) or plenary to discuss the particular campaign you are focused on.
If it is a sizeable enough group with different interests,
seek bids for different smaller groups to discuss a particular campaign,
and see what groups are viable. Or if it is a sizeable enough group focused
on the one issue you can still divide into smaller groups of 6, 8, or
10.
Questions include:
a) Is the model useful to us?
b) Do we need to build our own model, and if so how can we build it?
c) What tactics and strategies can be utilised if a campaign gets to stage
6, say, but the government refuses to change its policy (e.g. Irish government
granting use of Shannon airport to USA troops going to Iraq)?
6. Conclusions/Comments to close. Can
be done a round, asking people to share just a sentence each.
Here is a shortened version of what Moyer lists as the tasks for
the change movement at each stage -
1) Document that a serious problem exists; maintain active
opposition no matter how small.
2) Document problem including involvement of powerholders;
document citizens' attempts to use normal channels and prove they don't
work; become experts; build small opposition organisations.
3) Recognise historical conditions that help make a new
movement possible; create, inspire and prepare new wave groups; prepare
pre-existing groups; personalise the problem; begin small prototype nonviolent
action projects.
4) Create a new grassroots based social movement; put powerholders'
policies into public consciousness as contentious; create public platform
for the movement to educate people; create public dissonance on the issue.
5) Become strategists; form political and personal support
groups; adopt nonviolence; adopt empowerment models of organisation and
leadership.
6) Keep the issue and powerholders' values and violations
on the agenda; switch from crisis protest to waging protracted social
struggle to achieve positive social change; keep trying to get bigger
majority opinion; involve large numbers in grassroots programmes.
7) Wage a successful 'endgame' strategy to win one or more
demands; recognise/celebrate success; raise larger issues and propose
alternative paradigms; create new decentralised centres of power; continue
the movement.
8) Work to assure that demands achieved are maintained and
circle back to focus the movement on other demands.
Further resources: Bill Moyer, who
died in 2002, was a US peace activist who developed more comprehensive
materials in relation to the above. Do a web search for 'Bill Moyer Movement
Action Plan' or contact INNATE for details.
[This item first appeared with Nonviolent
News 124: November 2004]
|